Rutenberg Capital · Early-stage venture · First cheques

Sheridan, Wyoming · Founders anywhere

We back founders who ship.

Pre-seed and seed. First cheques, fast decisions, standard terms. For AI-native founders who do in a week what used to take a company a quarter — and who would rather hear no in three days than maybe in three months.

Scroll. It gets less polite.

Ship daily ▲ up Fail hard, fix by lunch ▲ up AI-native ▲ up Warm intros optional Degrees not checked 40-slide decks ▼ down Quarterly roadmaps ▼ down NDAs before hello ▼ down Five sentences and a link ▲ up Decisions in days ▲ up "Synergies" ▼ delisted Founders who have done hard things ▲ up

I The thesis

Three years ago this took forty people and a year. Today it takes one founder who refuses to wait.

The cost of building has collapsed. A founder with taste, judgement and a model open in the next tab now ships what a funded team shipped in 2022 — before lunch. Most people have not noticed. The ones who have are the only people we want to meet.

We are an early-stage investor for that founder. Small, independent, privately held. We move at the speed you do, because anything slower would be embarrassing.

How we invest →

II The ledger

Who we back. Who we don't.

Extraordinary is not a compliment here. It is the minimum. The right-hand column is struck through on purpose.

Credit — we backDebit — we don't
01Ships something real every day.Plans to start once the round closes.
02Uses AI to build like a team of twenty.Has "AI" on slide three and nowhere else.
03Has done something outstanding before. Can show it.Has a CV, an MBA and a list of employers.
04Fails hard, fixes it by lunch, tries again.Needs a post-mortem, a retro and a sprint.
05Thinks hard and writes clearly.Has a forty-slide deck and needs an hour to explain it.
06Wants a decision, and a fast one.Wants a "process" and a "partnership journey".
07Would build it anyway. Money makes it faster.Would build it if someone pays them to.
08Is, frankly, a little unreasonable.Is normal. Perfectly nice. Not for us.

Balance Extraordinary or nothing

III Field notes

What an AI-native founder actually does.

Not a mindset. Behaviour. Observed in the wild, written down so nobody can pretend it is vague.

  1. Has a model open in the next tab. Always.

    Writing code, reading contracts, drafting the cold email, arguing with itself about pricing. Not a tool they "adopted". The way the work is done.

  2. Ships on the day the idea arrives.

    Prototype by evening, in front of a user by tomorrow, killed or kept by Friday. The loop is the strategy.

  3. Knows exactly where the model is wrong.

    Fluency is not trust. They check, they test, they keep the judgement for themselves and delegate the typing.

  4. Does the work of a department before the first hire.

    Design, code, support, legal first drafts, the landing page, the demo video. Then hires only for what a model still cannot do.

  5. Writes a page instead of booking a meeting.

    A clear paragraph someone can disagree with tomorrow beats an hour of anyone's calendar.

  6. Has built something hard before — and can show it.

    A product, a paper, a repository, a company, a thing people paid for. Degrees are fine. They are just not evidence.

  7. Treats a no as data, not as a verdict.

    Ours included. If we pass and you are right, we would like to hear about it.

IV How we decide

Days. Not months.

One email starts it. A decision-maker reads it. Nobody has to "take it to the Monday meeting", because there isn't one.

Emails to start1

To info@rutenberg.capital. Five sentences and a link. No deck required.

First reply3days

A real answer from a real person: a call, or a short, honest no.

Yes or no14days

From first call to a written decision with reasons. No open-ended maybes.

Committees0

The people you talk to are the people who decide. That is the whole org chart.

  1. Day 0

    You write

    What you built, why now, a link. Cold is fine.

  2. Day 1–3

    We read & reply

    Every email, by a decision-maker. You hear back either way.

  3. Week 1

    We talk

    One call. Show us the product, not the market slide.

  4. Week 2

    We decide

    Yes or no, in writing, with reasons.

  5. Then

    We wire

    Standard documents, quick signatures. The work starts.

V Index

Where we look.

Software first, because that is where one AI-native founder now equals a company. The last line is there on purpose.

  • AI-native software§ 1Products that could not exist before models
  • Developer & infrastructure tools§ 2What builders reach for every day
  • Fintech & the plumbing of money§ 3Payments, compliance, back-office, credit
  • Security & privacy§ 4Trust that survives an audit
  • Health & life sciences software§ 5Where speed literally matters
  • Marketplaces & consumer§ 6With a reason to exist beyond a discount
  • The thing we have not thought of§ 7Convince us. Briefly.

Geography is not a filter. If you can take a call and sign a document, you are close enough.

VI The deal

Standard terms. No games.

The paperwork should be the boring part. Here is how ours compares with what founders tell us they meet elsewhere.

TermRutenbergThe usual
DecisionWritten yes or no within about two weeks of the first call."We'll circle back after partner meeting." Six weeks later, silence.
DocumentsIndustry-standard SAFE or priced-round forms. Read them in an afternoon.Bespoke 60-page documents with a clause your lawyer has never seen.
Exotic clausesNone. No ratchets, no super pro-rata traps, no surprise vetoes."It's market." It is not.
Board seatNot at pre-seed. You run the company; we answer the phone.A seat, an observer, and a monthly deck.
NDANot at the pitch stage. Nobody signs them. Leave out what you must.Also no — but with a longer email about it.
Warm introNice. Never required. Cold email gets the same attention."Who sent you?"
After the wireAvailable, fast, and quiet unless you want noise. Intros on request."Value-add platform." A Slack channel nobody reads.

VII For the record

Ordinary is a choice.

So is the opposite.

We fund the opposite.

VIII The application

One email. Five sentences. A link.

That is the whole application. No form, no portal, no "tell us about your journey". If you cannot say what you built in five sentences, that is the first thing we would work on together.

To: info@rutenberg.capital
Subject: Pitch: <your company>
Body: 5 sentences. What it does, who pays, what you shipped last week, why you, why now.
Link: product, demo, repo — anything real.
Attachments: deck.pdf CV.pdf NDA.docx none.

IX Questions

Asked often enough.

Short answers. If yours is not here, email it. You will get a short answer too.

Q.01Do you lead rounds?+

We write first cheques and we are comfortable being the first yes. We are happy to lead a pre-seed and equally happy to join a round someone else is leading, as long as the terms are standard and the decision can be made quickly.

Q.02What stage exactly?+

Pre-seed and seed. Up to and including your first priced round. If you are raising a Series B, we are not the right email — but we may know who is.

Q.03Do I need a deck?+

No. Five sentences and a link to something real beats fifteen slides about a market. If you already have a short deck, attach it. If you have a forty-slide one, do not.

Q.04Do I need a warm introduction?+

No. Cold emails are read with exactly the same attention, by the same person. A good introduction saves you one sentence; it does not change the answer.

Q.05Will you sign an NDA?+

Not at the pitch stage — nobody serious does, and we see too many companies to make that promise honestly. Leave out what you would not want us to see. We treat what you send with care regardless.

Q.06Do you invest outside the United States?+

Yes. We are a Wyoming company with an international outlook. If you can take a call and sign a standard document, geography is not the problem. Some structures take an extra week of paperwork; that is all.

Q.07What do you mean by "AI-native"?+

A founder who uses models the way an earlier generation used electricity: constantly, without ceremony, and with a very clear idea of where they fail. See the field notes above. It is a behaviour, not a sector.

Q.08What if you say no?+

You will get the no in writing, with the reason. Then you will get on with it. If we were wrong, write again in six months with what changed. We like being shown to be wrong; it is cheaper than the alternative.

Q.09Who is behind Rutenberg Capital?+

A small, independent, privately held firm, organised as a Wyoming LLC in February 2024 and run by people who prefer doing things to talking about them. More on the about page, which is short for the same reason.

Turning Ambition into Action.

If you have read this far and recognised yourself, stop reading.